Published on February 1, 2011

Over the past eight months, a number of articles have appeared on The Rational Walk related to the Deepwater Horizon disaster and related investment opportunities.  Value investors know that times of stress and uncertainty create opportunities in the financial markets whether the turmoil is due to natural disasters, political unrest, or the fallout from accidents such as the Deepwater Horizon incident.

Panic and Uncertainty Leads to Opportunities

Mr. Market always sells entire industry sectors indiscriminately first and asks questions later.  The key question for investors involves judging where the true opportunities exist and avoiding value traps that carry risk of permanent loss of capital.  As things have turned out, investors would have done well to buy any of the stocks impacted by the Deepwater Horizon disaster including BP and Transocean.  In fact, many smart investors purchased BP stock in the wake of the disaster and have done very well.

Rather than attempting to judge the probability of ruinous consequences for BP and Transocean, we decided to focus attention on companies that were not directly involved in the disaster but had been punished by the  market nonetheless.  This research resulted in taking a position in Noble Corporation on June 3.  This position has now been closed for a total return of 38.5 percent compared to a return of approximately 20% for the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) during the same period (both figures include dividends).

Noble Investment Thesis Revisited

In our initial profile of Noble Corporation, the following main points were made regarding the bullish investment thesis:

1. Noble’s historical performance had been very strong over a long period of time and management accomplished the track record with a minimal amount of leverage.  Looking at Noble’s record from 2000 to 2009, we observed that margins and return on equity had dramatically accelerated as the price of oil skyrocketed during the latter part of the decade and that the company appeared to be managing through the dramatic decline in oil prices that took place in 2009 partly due to long term contracts at historically high dayrates.

2. Noble had a very strong record of free cash flow generation over the past five years and management appeared to have a solid strategy in place that balanced returning cash to shareholders and funding the company’s newbuild program.

3. From a geographic perspective, Noble was clearly exposed to the Gulf of Mexico but over 77 percent  of  revenues were attributed to other countries, with Mexico accounting for 23 percent of 2009 revenues.  We hypothesized (incorrectly as it turns out) that Mexico may be a destination for idled rigs in the U.S. Gulf of  Mexico in the event of an extended moratorium.

4. Based on an observation of the importance of deepwater exploration for the energy security of  the United States, we believed that a permanent ban in the Gulf of Mexico was unlikely and that once the Macondo well was capped, a more reflective political environment would result in relaxation of the ban.

Significant Events Since June 2010

While long term investors should avoid excessive focus on small developments that invariably emerge from time to time, it is critical to keep on top of all news  and developments particularly in cases where a volatile industry environment exists.  The following major events took place with respect to Noble Corporation since June 2010. (We focus on Noble-specific events rather than the timeline associated with the Macondo well itself or the political developments, all of which has been well covered elsewhere):

Noble acquired Frontier Drilling. We covered the announcement when it was made on June 30, 2010 and noted that the deal was funded with cash that Noble planned to raise in debt offerings.  The deal appeared to be done on attractive terms for  Noble and was possible only because of the company’s previous aversion to debt.  The company also announced a major agreement with Shell that added significant backlog and ensured the continued utilization of the acquired Frontier fleet.  The dayrates and terms appeared to be attractive.  Overall, this appeared to be a positive development, although the increase in financial leverage slightly increased the risk profile of  the company that was built into our initial investment thesis.

Noble announced solid Q2 2010 Results. Although results were negatively impacted by the fallout from the Deepwater Horizon disaster, Noble posted respectable Q2 results which we analyzed on July 20, 2010.  We noted that negative trends were emerging in the jackup fleet in terms of utilization and dayrates and that overall fleet utilization declined.  We  presented a ten quarter summary of Noble results to examine trends over a longer period of time.  While trends were somewhat negative, Noble still managed to post healthy cash flow for the first half of 2010.

Noble Q3 2010 Results Impacted But  “Worst May Have Passed”. Noble posted a sharp fall in contract drilling revenues for the third quarter despite the addition of the Frontier rigs.  We covered the quarterly release on October 21 and noted continuing drops  in fleet utilization and dayrates.  Although the results were disappointing, the Obama Administration had recently lifted the official moratorium and it appeared  that Q4 results would be materially better.  Based on our analysis of the fleet and contracted dayrates, we estimated that contract drilling revenues would rise to the  neighborhood of $630 million in Q4.

Noble Q4 Results Announced. On January 26, 2011, fourth quarter results were announced.  Although contract drilling revenues were higher that Q3 at $614.5 million, the results fell short of our $630 million estimate partly due to a major drop in utilization for the semisubmersible fleet and dayrates that remained at depressed levels, although with a slight improvement from the third quarter.  A number of jackup rigs operating in Mexico were moved to the Gulf of Mexico and warm stacked. In the conference call following the earnings release, management guided analysts to expect a capital expenditure program of approximately $2 billion for 2011.

Noble May Face Headwinds in Q1

Based on our analysis of Noble’s fleet based on the latest fleet status report, it appears nearly certain that contract drilling revenues will decline significantly in the current quarter.  Based on our estimate, contract drilling revenues could fall to the $510 to $520 million level for the quarter due to declining revenues in Mexico, West Africa, the Arabian Gulf, and Southeast Asia.  Click on this link for our analysis of the latest fleet status and revenue projections for Q1 2011.

Sell Rationale

One of the dangers facing investors involves not having a firm sell rationale in place at the time of purchase. When a security is purchased, the investor should not only describe the reason for the purchase but also consider the conditions under which the position should be liquidated.  Some may criticize this approach as deviating from the “buy and hold” school of investing and at odds with value investing in general but nothing could be further from the truth.  Value investing is about buying undervalued securities, but without a solid sell discipline, good analysis at the outset can be diluted by failing to act when an investment thesis has played out.

In the case of Noble, the investment thesis was based on the market’s severe overreaction to the Deepwater Horizon disaster and the subsequent pummeling of nearly all stocks associated with offshore oil and gas exploration.  Based on the factors discussed above, Noble appeared to be trading at a depressed valuation relative to our evaluation of its long term normalized earnings power, free cash flow generation capability, and risk profile based on financial leverage.  Our investment thesis was not based on the price of oil.

While Noble has performed as well as one could expect in light of subsequent events and made an opportunistic acquisition that could provide long term benefits, financial leverage is higher than it was at the time of purchase and it appears to be headed higher.  Given the fact that free cash flow generation in 2011 is highly unlikely to approach the company’s $2 billion capex program, more debt may be required to fully fund these initiatives.

Avoid Changing Investment Rationale To Justify a Hold

One of the main dangers investors face involves changing the investment rationale as a stock price advances.  To justify holding Noble Corporation at $38 requires a completely different investment thesis than purchasing shares at under $28.

One could come up with a solid investment thesis for Noble even at today’s price given the company’s newbuild program, healthy backlog, capable management team, and prospects for higher oil prices to support expansion of dayrates going forward.  However, this was not our investment thesis.

At the time of purchase, our price target was in the low to mid 40s; however, this target did not account for the higher leverage and the poorer than expected results over the past two quarters and prospects for higher debt going forward.  As a result, it seems more prudent to declare victory and move on to other opportunities.

Disclosure:  The author of this article sold his position in Noble Corporation on February 1, 2011.  This article is not investment advice — see our disclaimer for more information.  By using this site, you agree to our terms and conditions.

Revisiting Noble Corporation Investment Thesis and Importance of Sell Discipline

4 thoughts on “Revisiting Noble Corporation Investment Thesis and Importance of Sell Discipline

  • February 1, 2011 at 8:27 pm
    Permalink

    My analysis and buy/sell timing was remarkably similar. I managed to pick up shares below $30 and sold out after the index announcement.

    I’m bullish on oil long-term and think that NE will do just fine, but I’m growing less bullish on the overall market lately and trying to raise cash. NE was designed as a medium-term play for me due to short-term volatility in the drilling market.

    Thanks for explaining your rationale.

  • February 2, 2011 at 10:18 am
    Permalink

    It’s admirable to stick to your original thesis. I had the same one going in but am taking a different route now. I have rationally assessed future newbuilds, developments, and opportunities for Noble’s future.

    Part of my initial purchase was due to my belief in management’s abilities; they’ve outperformed my expectations with Frontier, fleet deployment, etc. and I am still of the belief they will continue creating shareholder value. I think I’m going to continue holding this one; I can see what you’re doing but I’m happy as a business owner here. Earning power is likely to go much higher in the next year or two

    • February 2, 2011 at 11:41 am
      Permalink

      I think that there is a good probability that you will be correct and do well with Noble going forward. I do question whether the market understands the degree to which contract drilling revenues are likely to fall in Q1 (assuming the analysis I posted is in the ball park). And I think that free cash flow is going to be inadequate to cover capex. However, looking a couple years out when the new rigs are online and hopefully generating good dayrates, I think Noble will be doing just fine, assuming healthy oil prices.

      From prior experience I know that modifying an investment thesis once a stock has achieved its initial objective can be dangerous. There are lots of psychological reasons people hold on to winners for too long. I believe in buy & hold in many cases but in special situations like taking advantage of the Gulf panic, I think it’s best to avoid getting attached to winners once they have played out.

Comments are closed.

X

Forgot Password?

Join Us

Password Reset
Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.